Neuropathy & Landing Gear — the mechanical foundation first

Neuropathy changes
what you feel.
Not what the ground does.

The ground is still flat. Every step still misloads the same subtalar joint axis (the pivot between your heel bone and the bone above it — angled at 42° of inclination and 16° of deviation). Two million people — different conditions, different starting points — walked on the same floor. They got the same answer.

Shop T-100 Landing Gear

Put them in your shoes. Take a step. Your body will tell you.
95 out of 100 say yes. The other 5 get every cent back.

Or keep reading — the ground problem comes before everything else.

2,000,000+
Customers
99,000+
Reviews · 4.8★
95%
Would Recommend
90 days
Money-back guarantee
01 — The problem that precedes every other problem

Flat ground is an unnatural surface. For everyone. Every step.

The human foot evolved on varied terrain. The subtalar joint — the hinge below your ankle that governs how your entire body moves above it — requires an asymmetric surface to sequence correctly. Flat ground removes that surface. Every step, thousands of times a day.

The subtalar joint axis runs at 42° from horizontal and 16° toward the body's midline. It is not a symmetric structure — and it has never been designed for a symmetric floor. When that axis is never correctly loaded, the kinematic chain above it — the ankle, knee, hip, and lower back — compensates with every step it takes.

This is the mechanical context for every person who walks on flat ground. Neuropathy, arch pain, knee pain, fatigue — these are different experiences of the same upstream problem. Landing Gear addresses the upstream problem. The geometry. The axis. The foundation that comes before everything else.

The foot doesn't know you have neuropathy.
It knows what the ground feels like.
42°
Subtalar joint axis — vertical obliquity

Documented by Manter in The Anatomical Record, 1941. The axis that governs how the entire foot, ankle, and leg sequences through each step.

16°
Subtalar joint axis — medial deviation

The axis deviates toward the body's midline. Every arch support on the market is symmetric. The geometry mismatch is structural.

0
Other OTC products with 3D motion capture data

No other OTC insole has demonstrated statistically significant STJ correction through controlled 3D gait analysis. Landing Gear is the only one measured.

If your feet feel worse after long hours on hard floors — retail shifts, warehouse work, hospital rounds — that's the flat-ground problem compounding on an already-challenged kinematic chain. The floor is the constant. Landing Gear changes what your foot meets when it lands.

02 — The mechanical insult that doesn't stop

The longest nerves in the human body run through your feet.
Every misloaded step reaches them.

Peripheral neuropathy affects the distal nerves first — the longest pathways, the most mechanically exposed. The foot and lower leg are already the most structurally vulnerable. Flat ground loads them incorrectly 8,000 times a day. The mechanical problem doesn't pause for the nerve problem.

The foot's spring mechanism depends on the subtalar joint rotating through its 42°/16° axis correctly. When that happens, pronation at heel strike stores kinetic energy in the Achilles and plantar fascia — and the supination that follows releases it as forward propulsion. Impact is absorbed, converted, and returned as motion. The peripheral nerves that run through the plantar fascia, along the tibial pathway, and around the ankle are moving through tissue that is working as it was designed to work.

When flat ground forces the STJ outside its optimal axis, the spring mechanism doesn't fully engage. Impact doesn't convert — it transmits upward as compressive force through soft tissue. The same pathways that peripheral nerves run through absorb that load on each stride, at the exact location where neuropathy already makes the tissue more vulnerable to it.

Motor nerve damage from neuropathy weakens the intrinsic foot muscles, altering how the foot plants and how load distributes across the sole. Sensory nerve damage removes the proprioceptive feedback that normally guides micro-adjustments in gait. Both effects make the foot more dependent on correct geometric input from the ground up — and more vulnerable when that input is absent. Landing Gear provides the geometric input. The 42°/16° axis, set at the heel, before the rest of the foot loads.

✕ Without correct axis loading
Impact goes through the tissue — not through the spring.

Heel strikes flat ground. STJ pronates past its optimal axis. The spring mechanism doesn't engage. Compressive force distributes through the soft tissue pathways where peripheral nerves run — 8,000 times a day, at the location neuropathy makes most vulnerable.

✓ With correct axis loading
Impact converts to motion. The spring works.

Landing Gear sets the 42°/16° geometry at heel contact. The STJ sequences through its correct axis. Pronation stores kinetic energy; supination returns it as forward propulsion. Soft tissue load distributes as it was designed to — through motion, not compression.

Landing Gear does not treat peripheral neuropathy. It changes the mechanical environment the affected nerves operate in — reducing the repetitive compressive tissue stress that flat ground generates at the precise location where neuropathy makes the foot most vulnerable to it.

03 — Why what came before didn't solve it

The entire insole category was built on a model that has since been overturned.

This matters for neuropathy patients specifically — because they are often handed arch supports by well-meaning clinicians following a paradigm that peer-reviewed science formally abandoned in 2023.

The mobile adaptor–rigid lever model was the theoretical foundation for every arch support and orthotic design for decades. It described how the foot should transition from flexible shock absorption at heel strike to rigid lever at push-off — and it prescribed arch support as the mechanism to control that transition.

The model was never experimentally validated. It was a theoretical framework that became a design specification before anyone proved it was correct.

2023 — Biological Reviews, Cambridge Philosophical Society
Behling, Rainbow, Welte & Kelly — Revising the Structure–Function Paradigm in Foot Biomechanics

A comprehensive peer-reviewed analysis concluded that the mobile adaptor–rigid lever model is "not supported by available evidence" and called for the scientific community to formally abandon it as the basis for footwear and orthotic design.

This is not a fringe finding. Biological Reviews is published by the Cambridge Philosophical Society — one of the oldest and most respected scientific societies in the world. Every arch support insole — from pharmacy shelf to custom orthotic — was designed around a model this paper invalidated.

doi.org/10.1111/brv.12981 ↗

What replaces it? The subtalar joint axis. The 42°/16° geometry documented in 1941 that the entire arch support category has always ignored. Landing Gear was designed around that axis — not the arch. That is not a preference or a marketing position. It is where the lever arm actually is.

"The floor hasn't changed. Your landing gear can."

Shop T-100 Landing Gear — $64.95 Read their stories →
04 — What independent 3D motion capture measured

When the subtalar joint axis was used as the design specification, the correction was measurable.

BioMechanica LLC, an independent Portland biomechanics laboratory, conducted a controlled 3D motion capture study. n=31 subjects. All differences p << 0.005. No other OTC product has equivalent data.

The study measured tibia–heel deviation — how far each subject's gait deviated from the correct subtalar joint axis range during walking. Conditions included standard EVA foam, the market-leading OTC arch support (Superfeet), and both Protalus Landing Gear models. Twenty NaturalPoint Optitrack cameras at 100fps. 31 subjects measured under all four conditions.

Mean deviation from correct subtalar axis — n=31 subjects

Lower = closer to correct axis range. BioMechanica LLC, 2019. All differences p << 0.005.

Product Mean deviation Visual vs. standard
Standard EVA foam 9.2°
Baseline
Superfeet — arch support 6.8°
−26%
Protalus T-100 Landing Gear 5.0°
−46%
Protalus M-100 Landing Gear 3.2°
−65%

People walking within correct axis range — n=31

How many real people crossed into the mechanical range where the foot can sequence correctly.

Standard EVA
3
of 31 · 10%
What every other product starts from.
Superfeet arch support
6
of 31 · 19%
Better shape. Wrong location. 25 people still outside.
Protalus T-100
19
of 31 · 61%
Geometry at the heel. The recommended starting point.
Protalus M-100
28
of 31 · 90%
9 in 10 people. Deeper geometry. Step up if needed.

"No other OTC insole has demonstrated statistically significant tibia–heel and tibia–arch pronation reduction through 3D motion capture. The geometry-based approach produced results the shape-based approach — including the best-selling arch support — could not."

— Dr. Martyn R. Shorten, Ph.D., Former Director, Nike Sport Research Laboratory · BioMechanica LLC, 2019
05 — What Landing Gear does. What it doesn't claim.

Landing Gear gives the foot
the geometry it evolved for.

That's the claim. The foot gets the correct geometric environment at heel strike. What happens above that — in the ankle, knee, hip, and back — is what the body does with correct mechanics.

Every arch support insole
Protalus Landing Gear
Every arch support insole
Acts at the arch. After heel strike.

Arch contact happens at midstance — after the heel has already landed and set the starting position of the entire gait cycle. The arch support engages too late to change what the subtalar joint axis does at the decisive moment.

Protalus Landing Gear
Acts at the heel. At heel strike.

The two heel projections create an asymmetric surface the moment the foot lands — before the arch loads, before the kinematic chain sequences, before the step begins. The geometry is set from contact point one.

Designed from a static foot
A photo of how the foot looks at rest

Molds, scans, and contours capture the foot standing still. But gait is not a static event — it's a sequence of rotations through a moving axis. Matching the static shape doesn't correct the dynamic motion.

Designed from a foot in motion
The movie the foot evolved for

The geometry was developed and validated through the full gait cycle — tested against the subtalar joint axis through every phase of each step. Not molded from a static position. Not a shape. A runway.

Symmetric by construction
Cannot guide an asymmetric axis

Every arch support is the same on both sides. The subtalar joint axis deviates 16° toward the body's midline. Symmetry cannot guide asymmetric rotation. The mismatch is structural and irreversible.

Asymmetric by design
Mirrors the actual STJ axis

The medial heel projection is higher than the lateral — mirroring the 16° deviation of the subtalar joint axis. Not because it looks right. Because that's the geometry the axis needs to sequence through the correct range.

Every step either loads the axis correctly or it doesn't.
Flat ground has always made that decision for you.

The geometric foundation for every step

Start with the ground.
Start with T-100.

T-100 Landing Gear puts 61% of people within the correct subtalar joint axis range — compared to 19% with the leading arch support. Independent 3D motion capture. 31 subjects. If you need to step up to M-100's deeper geometry later, you will know.

Shop T-100 Landing Gear — $64.95 Step up to M-100 →

Put them in your shoes. Take a step. Your body will tell you.
95 out of 100 say yes. The other 5 get every cent back.

Still not convinced?

Not sure if this is right for your situation?

Talk to someone who knows. Protalus Care is available Mon–Fri 6am–5pm PT.